On the biotechnology battlefield, proponents try to sell the benefits of genetically modified foods, and opponents try to sell the risks. Yet for both camps, oversimplified assumptions about consumers have lead to counter productive strategies and tactics. For instance, proponents assume the biotechnology issue will “blow over” and that good science sells, while opponents assume that consumers want to be informed, and that risks of the unknown are more important than benefits. Based on an understanding of consumer behavior, eight assumptions of proponents and opponents are examined and revised. The resulting insights point to specific changes that both proponents and opponents of biotechnology can use to more effectively educate their constituents.

For more information seee Wansink, Brian and Junyong Kim (2001), “The Marketing Battle Over Genetically Modified Foods: False Assumptions about Consumer Behavior,” American Behavioral Scientist, 44:8 (April), 1405-1417 © 2001 Sage Publications, Inc.

Contact:
Brian Wansink, PhD
Food and Brand Lab, Director
110 Warren Hall
Cornell University
Ithaca, NY 14853
Email: foodandbrandlab@cornell.edu

*This study was conducted at the University of Illinois, former location of the Cornell Food and Brand Lab.

Back to (Mis)Marketing Soy.

cardi logo and a e m logo and Cornell University